So, I've been
working through this for some time now. I have at least one pretty
big issue with Paul, so reading his words from when he wrote/taught
the Philippians about contentment was a little difficult. I
understand the words and see their validity, but because it was Paul…
I'm not sure I can adequately explain my issue.
Anyway… I've felt
confused about the difference between contentment and complacency for
a while. Mostly because we are told to be content, but NOT
complacent. The first definition found via google for each are as
follows:
contentment – a
state of happiness and satisfaction
complacent –
showing smug or uncritical satisfaction with oneself or one's
achievements
While those are the
given definitions, my understanding of the two words has been more
like:
contentment –
accepting what is without motivation to pursue more
complacency –
ignorance of need for improvement or exceeding laziness of character
which stagnates an individual where they are such that they do not
move forward or changeable
Based on common
usage, I think the actual definition of complacency is very much a
combination of my understanding and the definition cited. However, I
think the second part of my definition for complacency is the more
accurate one based on usage I've heard and read.
So, given all that,
I can completely understand how and why we would be advised against
complacency. While, especially in the way Paul uses it, I really
even still have a tough time with contentment. I do believe we
should choose to be happy in whatsoever circumstances we find
ourselves. However, if we do so, how do we feel motivated to improve
our circumstances? I'm still troubling over this, in fact. I guess
if I come to a point where I understand it fully, I'll share what I
come up with. Until then, tell me what YOU think! I seriously would
love some help with this and reading your perspective could be just
what I need! Thank you in advance if you take some time to help me
figure this out!
No comments:
Post a Comment